Should Hundreds Of New Nonprofits Be Created Each Year?

Each year, the amount of nonprofits operating in the United States swells even larger. The number of 501c3 organizations grew by 29.7% from 2003 through 2013 alone!
The debate often rages on whether we truly need to add such a large number of new nonprofits each year. Here are the arguments often heard for being more selective in adding new 501c3 organizations:
Starting any new organization, whether for-profit or nonprofit, brings with it odds of survival after 5 years below 2-3%. It takes a great idea combined with tremendous effort, proper people and a dash of luck to beat those odds!
The “Other” Side of the Story
Even armed with the above information, there are still excellent situations and strong reasons for creating certain new nonprofits.
Perhaps you will agree, as we explore this new nonprofit recently highlighted by Seth Godin in one of his very popular blog posts entitled “The DoSomething lessons.”
DoSomething.org is quite unique.
This recently approved organization was new to me. It did, however, seem to be game-changing enough to be a poster child for creating a new nonprofit. Plus, any organization, whether new or old, that can rally younger generations by the millions, is worth exploring.
This group has rallied 3.4 million people to do, as they phrase it, “make the world suck less.”
Their website is… quite different and quite thought-provoking. My favorite section is simply entitled Sexy Financials – subtitled as “our dashboards are like looking at frogs in 9th grade biology.”
Anyone who knows me will attest to my love for dashboards displaying vital metrics about any organization. This group has done just that and more with their 2014 recap.
They made their recap hard hitting and fun by wonderful pictures. Those pictures and a few key stats bring their community impact to life.
Do not be surprised if the somewhat boring old annual reports succumb to many more quarterly and annual dashboard summaries like DoSomething.org brought to like on their website.
I could go on and on about their communication skills and efforts. Suffice to say this 60-year-old nonprofit sector veteran is a fan!
There Are Good Reasons To Create New Nonprofits
We just perused on solid example above. If any organization can fulfill at least a portion of the criteria below, then I for one think they should make the plunge. If they do not have several of these, then perhaps joining up with an existing nonprofit is the best strategy.
Here are a few criteria that come to mind:
What did I miss? Do you think we need so many new nonprofits every year? Let us know in the comments below!
Comments
sondra lintelann-dellaripa
I vehemently disagree and find this conversation in the civic sector concerning beyond measure. First of all, minimizing competition allows poorly performing but intransigent nonprofits to continue to suck up support from federal, state and individual funding streams. Familiarity breeds the lowest common denominator, I'm afraid, in funding nonprofit work when there is minimal competition. Secondly, competition drives innovation. If you always do what you've always done because no one is challenging the status quo, then you'll always continue to do what you've always done. (see note on funding bias above). Finally, operating the BUSINESS of the nonrpfoit requires competitive factors to improve KPI's through shared knowledge and insights. I cannot agree with minimizing competition, knowing its not helping the nonprofit sector in the least.Michael J. Rosen, CFRE
Jay, we certainly do not need so many new nonprofits to be created every year. For that matter, we don't need all of the nonprofits we already have. However, we do need some new nonprofits that will bring innovative solutions or address previously unaddressed needs. I'm willing to let the free-market sort it all out. While I am in favor of the free-market, I would nevertheless like to see some enhanced regulation of the sector to more effectively weed out fraudulent organizations. Unfortunately, I'm not really sure how we would go about doing that without violating the Constitution and/or doing more harm than good.